Stalled, Stuck or Stale The Blog For Brands That Don't Have It All Together

Southwest Should Charge for Baggage

OK, I’m going to get in trouble here. I think Southwest Airlines should start charging for baggage. Before you start yelling at your computer (or through it), listen to my reasoning.

First of all, I’m not speaking as a passenger. As a frequent traveler myself, I am flabbergasted by how poorly the big legacy carriers tend to treat their passengers, and I love the fact that Southwest doesn’t ding my credit card at the check-in kiosk. And as a marketer, I know the public relations firestorm doing so would create. But the move makes sense from both a financial and branding perspective.

As of June 30th, Southwest had lost $37 million. For the first time in 37 years, the airline might be facing an annual loss (of as much as $70 million, according to industry analysts). While not the largest airline by revenue, Southwest does carry more passengers than any other airline–more than 100 million in 2008. If just ten percent of those passengers paid $10 per checked bag, that’s an additional $100 million in revenue. And at ten bucks per bag, Southwest would still be well under the $20 and $30 per bag that other airlines charge.

Charging for checked bags wouldn’t be as odd as you might think for Southwest. The airline already charges $75 to carry a pet on board. It charges $25 for unaccompanied minors. Its Business Select fares allow passengers priority boarding and “one premium beverage of your choice” for an additional $10 to $30. And in a little-noticed footnote on its website, Southwest says, “Effective June 17, 2009, the charge for checking a third bag or a bag weighing 51-70 pounds will be $50.” Sure, if Southwest started charging for checked bags some passengers might defect, but there’s really nowhere for them to go. And even if they did leave for a period of time out of protest, Southwest’s other strengths would likely bring them back.

Of course, there is the matter of Southwest’s high-profile “Bags Fly Free” campaign. The company has made hay out of the fact that while its competitors are nickel-and-diming their customers, Southwest won’t. It’s true that if Southwest were to change its policy it would have a short-term public relations challenge on its hands, but from a long-term branding standpoint charging for bags makes sense for a low fare, no-frills airline. Over the course of time, the protests would die out. Especially if Southwest quietly stops promoting its policy for a period of time before the change is made.

Baggage charges are here to stay–there’s no way the airlines can afford to give them up. To remain competitive, sooner or later Southwest will be forced to capture the revenue that it’s currently leaving on the table (or counter, as it were). While the idea may be highly unpopular, Southwest has an obligation to its shareholders and employees to prepare for that day. Given the track record of this smartly-managed company, I suspect it’s already doing so.

OK, let me have it.

Print Friendly and PDF